Repliant for Government & Public Services

The conversation layer for citizen services that have to answer every call.

Repliant runs voice, WhatsApp, SMS and web conversations across the citizen-services surface — helplines, scheme-status callbacks, grievance intake, utility consumer operations — integrated with India Stack rails, NIC-built backends, and your department's existing telephony. Deployable on MeghRaj or on department-owned on-prem infrastructure. Twenty-two Schedule VIII languages. Code-mixed speech handled. Every call auditable to the prompt level.

Deployable on MeghRaj STQC-aligned CERT-In reporting ready DPDP Act 2023 compliant GIGW 3.0 · WCAG 2.1 AA 22 Schedule VIII languages

HELPLINE · LIVE CONSENT CAPTURED · 14:32 IST
14:31

CITIZEN · Namaste ji, mujhe yeh jaanna hai ki meri vidhwa pension is mahine aayi hai ya nahi. "Hello sir, I need to know whether my widow pension has been credited this month."

14:31

REPLIANT · Ji bilkul. Aapki permission se Aadhaar se verify karunga — OTP bhej doon? "Of course. With your permission I'll verify against your Aadhaar — may I send an OTP?"

AADHAAR · OTP AUTH · CONSENT ARTEFACT WRITTEN

UID (masked)XXXX XXXX 4187
Purposepension_status_lookup
TTLsession · 14 min
SchemeState widow pension
Statuscredited · 28 Apr
Amount₹ 1,200
14:32

REPLIANT · ₹1,200 aapke bank account mein 28 April ko credit ho chuki hai. Detail WhatsApp pe bhej raha hoon. "₹1,200 was credited to your bank account on 28 April. I'm sending the detail on WhatsApp."

WHATSAPP · DLT TEMPLATE · HI-EN DELIVERED · 14:32:08

₹1,200 vidhwa pension aapke account mein 28-Apr ko credit ho chuki hai.

₹1,200 widow pension credited to your account on 28-Apr. Ref: WP/2026/04/8841.

CPGRAMS ticket auto-created · DSWO/2026/00148 · nodal officer notified

aadhaar · otp · consent on record nic backend · read trai dlt · header registered cpgrams · ticketed

12,84,302

citizen conversations handled this month · across deployments

↑ one citizen · one consent artefact · one auditable thread · two systems written

The reality of citizen–government conversations

The helpline is the front door of the state, and it has been overwhelmed for two decades.

A widow in Koraput dials the pension helpline at 8 p.m. She does not speak English. The IVR offers her Hindi or English. She waits on hold and hangs up at minute eleven. The next day she takes a bus to the block office. She loses a day of wages. Her daughter has done this twice this month.

Across a single mission-mode programme, the inbound helpline volume runs into 815 lakh calls a month at peak; CPGRAMS itself absorbs over 20 lakh grievances a year. The contact-centre footprint that backs all of this is staffed across multiple BPO LoTs, working in three languages where the Constitution recognises twenty-two. The accessibility obligation — RPwD Act, GIGW 3.0 — is not a checkbox. For a citizen who is blind, voice is the service.

And the political cost of failure is asymmetric in a way no commercial buyer experiences. A misrouted pension query is not a CSAT drop. It is a question in the next Assembly session. A wrong scheme eligibility answer reaches the Standing Committee within a quarter. A breach of citizen data under DPDP Act 2023 reaches the Data Protection Board faster than that.

The departments doing this work know all of this. They have presentations on it. What they do not have is a conversation layer that respects the obligations and runs at the volume.

Repliant is not a CX vendor. It is the conversation layer that lets a department keep its promise to every caller, in the language they actually speak, under the obligations the statute actually carries.

What Repliant handles for government departments.

Five named workflows. Each measured against an outcome a Mission Director, a Collector, or a Principal Secretary already reports on — not a vendor invention.

WORKFLOW 01 · scheme.status_callback

Scheme-status callbacks at mission scale.

Repliant places outbound voice and WhatsApp messages in the beneficiary's preferred Schedule VIII language — installment confirmation, empanelment query, beneficiary-list status. Where Aadhaar consent is on record, authentication runs via OTP under the AUA/KUA framework before any benefit-status field is read. Scheme status is read from the relevant NIC backend over its existing API. The transcript, the consent artefact, and the disposition code are written to an audit store the department's CAG-facing team can query directly.

Outcome · 89% of beneficiaries reached at first attempt · status delivered within 24 hours · pilot cohort, North-East mission programme

Outbound · 14 lakh beneficiary cohort · 30-day window · single state directorate

ELIGIBLE · CONSENT OK ATTEMPTED REACHED · FIRST ATTEMPT STATUS DELIVERED & LOGGED 14,02,118 13,21,440 · 94% 11,72,003 · 89% 11,21,884 · ledgered

WORKFLOW 02 · grievance.cpgrams_triage

Grievance intake, triage and routing — under CPGRAMS SLAs.

A citizen calls the department helpline. Repliant captures the grievance verbatim in the citizen's language, classifies it under the relevant CPGRAMS category and sub-category, identifies the correct nodal officer for that grievance class and that jurisdiction, files the ticket, and confirms the ticket number on WhatsApp in the citizen's preferred script. The Sevottam-aligned escalation matrix is read from your existing configuration; nothing is invented. Time-to-acknowledge sits inside the DARPG-circulated threshold by construction.

Outcome · 94 s median grievance-to-ticket · routed to correct nodal officer on 97.4% of first attempts

Triage tree · inbound grievance · pension & social-welfare class

capture · transcribe classify · CPGRAMS pension · status ration · eligibility scholarship · arrears life-safety · 112 escalation DSWO · nodal Civil Supplies Education · DDO human · live

WORKFLOW 03 · helpline.life_safety_surge

Helpline surge handling for citizen-safety lines — 181, 1098, 1099, 14416.

Citizen-safety helplines must never be queued. Repliant runs front-of-line triage, captures structured intake in the citizen's language, and routes every life-safety signal to a trained human responder within the stated SLA. The 112-class call is never closed by an agent. Informational calls — scheme awareness, follow-ups on a previously registered case — are handled end-to-end, freeing the human responder bench for the calls only they can take.

Outcome · 62% of human-responder bandwidth returned to life-safety work · single state, women & children helpline cohort

Inbound mix · post-deployment · n = 4.2 lakh calls / month

LIFE-SAFETY · HUMAN ONLY FOLLOW-UP ON OPEN CASE SCHEME AWARENESS · INFO PRANK / DROP / TEST 11% 22% 60% 7% human responders now spend their time only on the work only they can do

WORKFLOW 04 · utility.discom_water_consumer_ops

Utility consumer operations — DISCOMs, water boards, regional transport.

Outage status, bill explanation, new-connection progress, complaint registration, transformer-fault reporting. Repliant integrates with state DISCOM billing systems (the actual installed stack — not a marketing diagram), reads the consumer-of-record account, explains a slab change in plain language in the consumer's language, registers a complaint with a real ticket number, and follows up after the field restoration to confirm the consumer is back online. No invented tariffs. No invented restoration ETAs.

Outcome · complaint registration time 6 min → 38 s · vs. legacy IVR · one Tier-1 state DISCOM circle

Per-call resolution mix · post-deployment · DISCOM

BILL EXPLAINED · ENDED OUTAGE STATUS GIVEN COMPLAINT REGISTERED NEW CONN · STATUS TRANSFERRED TO HUMAN 36% 28% 22% 9% 5%

WORKFLOW 05 · notice.tax_municipal_clarification

Tax and municipal notice clarification — without crossing the quasi-judicial line.

A citizen receives a property-tax demand or a state-commercial-tax notice. They call or WhatsApp. Repliant authenticates, retrieves the demand from the issuing system, explains the line items in plain language in the citizen's language, and — for any quasi-judicial matter — routes to a designated officer with the case context attached. The agent does not opine on liability, does not negotiate a waiver, and does not interpret a section. It explains what is on the page and gets the citizen to the right human for anything beyond that.

Outcome · officer-time on routine notice clarification down by 71% · one ULB property-tax circle, FY 2025-26 H1

Notice-call disposition · before vs. after

BEFORE · LEGACY IVR + OFFICER AFTER · REPLIANT FRONT-OF-LINE routine 29% officer 71% agent-handled 87% 13% officer hours redeployed to objections, hearings, and complex demand cases

Other live workflows in deployment include agricultural advisory and mandi-price callbacks in the Kisan-Call-Centre register, eSanjeevani teleconsultation scheduling against ABDM-linked records (with explicit ABHA-mediated consent), and birth- and death-certificate status follow-ups at the ULB level. We add workflows only where the department's existing data flows make a clean, auditable integration possible.

Built to live inside the systems government already runs.

Repliant reads from and writes to India Stack rails, NIC-built backends, department service portals and the long tail of legacy systems — under the access controls and audit posture your CISO and your IT secretary already operate.

India Stack · consented citizen rails

consent-first · purpose-bound

Aadhaar Auth · e-KYC

via AUA / KUA · UIDAI

DigiLocker

issued document fetch

UPI · BBPS

collect · bill present

ABHA · ABDM

health record · consent

AA framework · eSign

financial data · signature

NIC-built & government platforms

read · write · ticket

CPGRAMS

grievance · nodal routing

eOffice

file movement · noting

eHospital · eSanjeevani

HMIS · telemedicine

Sevottam-aligned flows

grievance redressal

data.gov.in · APIs

open-data lookups

Department & PSU systems

scheme · revenue · utility

GSTN · IT e-filing

demand · status lookup

Sarathi · Vahan

transport · DL · RC

State DISCOM billing

SAP IS-U · Oracle CC&B

State revenue & land

Bhulekh · Bhoomi · DILRMP

Department ERPs

Oracle · SAP · in-house

Telephony · channel rails

TRAI DLT · CSCR · empanelled aggregators

Domestic toll-free

BSNL · MTNL · partners

A2P SMS · DLT-registered

header + template flow

WhatsApp Business API

via Meta BSPs

RCS Business · Jio · Airtel

where available

IVR replacement

Genesys · Avaya · Asterisk

Government runs a long tail of legacy systems — state revenue mainframes, decade-old Java middleware, paper-trail-only workflows, departments whose authoritative record is still an Oracle Forms screen maintained by a single person. Repliant deploys against SOAP, flat-file drops, scheduled batch reconciliation, and signed gateway patterns where the modern API does not yet exist. None of this requires a multi-crore middleware project before the first call lands. Empanelled SIs — TCS, Wipro, Infosys, HCL, LTIMindtree, and the NIC's own implementation teams — can pick up the integration and operate it without a Repliant engineer permanently on site.

Compliance · accessibility · language

Built for the obligations public service carries.

Most enterprise vendors treat compliance as a wall to clear before launch. In government, compliance is the product. Repliant ships with the statute expressed as policy the agent cannot work around, with the audit trail your second-line and your CAG team can sign in fifteen minutes, and with the language coverage the Constitution actually requires.

A · DATA · SECURITY · AUDIT

A posture your CISO can defend.

  • DPDP Act 2023 · Data Fiduciary obligations. Purpose limitation, consent capture & withdrawal, data principal rights workflows (access, correction, erasure, grievance), breach notification through the Data Protection Board mechanism.
  • CERT-In · 6-hour incident reporting. Workflow and contractual SLA aligned to the April 2022 CERT-In Directions; named SPOC on the department side, named SPOC on Repliant.
  • STQC-aligned engineering. Built against STQC's software-security and quality benchmarks; certification cycle status disclosed under NDA in security review.
  • Data localization · in India. All citizen data resident in India. Hosted on MeghRaj or on a MeitY-empanelled community cloud as the department prefers ; on-prem and air-gapped paths for security-classified work.
  • MeitY · AI & cloud advisories. Tracked and reflected in the deployment posture — including the advisories on generative-AI deployment in government context.
  • Audit log · prompt level. Every call has a signed, immutable record: channel, language, consent artefact, tools invoked with arguments, policies evaluated, the model trace, and the final disposition. Retention configurable per department.
  • Table stakes. SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 in force; available before security review.

B · ACCESSIBILITY · RPWD ACT & GIGW 3.0

A voice-first service is an access right.

  • Voice-first by design. A citizen who cannot read receives full service over voice. Every workflow has a voice path that is functionally equivalent to its text path.
  • RPwD Act 2016 alignment. Auditory, visual and cognitive accessibility considered at the workflow-design layer — not as a retrofit on a finished screen.
  • GIGW 3.0 · WCAG 2.1 AA. Any government-branded surface Repliant renders is built and tested to GIGW 3.0; AAA where reasonable. Keyboard-only navigation, screen-reader compatibility, assistive-tech interoperability tested before each release.
  • Sign-language relay handoff. For hearing-impaired citizens, a named handoff path to a sign-language video relay operator — where the department has the relay capacity in place — is built into the workflow library.
  • Cognitive accessibility. Plain-language scripting and a "slow mode" available for citizens who need pace control. Not a marketing feature; a serviceable accommodation.

C · LANGUAGE · INCLUSION

All twenty-two. Honestly.

  • Schedule VIII · 22 languages. Voice and text. See the coverage matrix below — it tells you where coverage is full, where it is partial, and where a human handoff is the honest answer.
  • Code-mixing handled. Hinglish, Tanglish, Banglish, Marathi-English — citizens speak the way they speak, and the agent does not flinch at a mid-sentence switch.
  • Dialect coverage flagged. Strong on major regional registers; in continuous improvement on tribal-language coverage; honest about scope. Where dialect accuracy is not yet adequate, the workflow routes to a human responder rather than guess.
  • Official Languages Act 1963. Hindi and English available on every workflow as a baseline; regional language added per the department's jurisdiction.

Coverage matrix · Schedule VIII

full · voice + text · in production  ·  partial · text strong · voice in tuning  ·  scoped · human handoff today

Language Script Voice IVR WhatsApp / SMS Code-mix with English Notes
HindiDevanagarifullfullfullmajor regional registers covered
BengaliBengalifullfullfullWest Bengal & Bangladeshi register both
TeluguTelugufullfullfullAP & TS regional accents
MarathiDevanagarifullfullfullVidarbha & coastal both
TamilTamilfullfullfullspoken register, not literary
UrduPerso-Arabic · Devanagarifullfullfullboth scripts supported
GujaratiGujaratifullfullfull
KannadaKannadafullfullfull
OdiaOdiafullfullpartialtribal-belt register in tuning
MalayalamMalayalamfullfullfull
PunjabiGurmukhifullfullfull
AssameseAssamesefullfullpartialBarak Valley register in tuning
MaithiliDevanagari · Tirhutapartialfullpartialvoice coverage in continuous improvement
SantaliOl Chiki · Devanagaripartialpartialhandoffhuman responder for nuanced cases
KashmiriPerso-Arabicpartialpartialhandoffin active tuning Q3 FY26
NepaliDevanagarifullfullpartialSikkim · Darjeeling register
SindhiPerso-Arabic · Devanagaripartialfullhandoffscript choice configurable
KonkaniDevanagari · Roman · KannadapartialfullpartialGoan register strongest
DogriDevanagaripartialpartialhandoffvoice in scoping
Manipuri (Meitei)Meitei Mayek · Bengalipartialpartialhandoffboth scripts supported, voice in tuning
BodoDevanagaripartialpartialhandoffcommunity-partnered tuning underway
EnglishLatinfullfullfullbaseline · Indian English register

Coverage is reviewed every quarter against actual call-volume patterns. Where a department's jurisdiction makes a "partial" language load-bearing, we treat that as a release-blocker and tune to full before go-live.

Deployment modes

Where Repliant runs — your department's choice, not ours.

Mode Where the workload runs Best fit for Citizen-data residency Typical posture review
MeghRaj MeitY-empanelled CSPs on the GI Cloud framework most missions · most Union ministries India · MeghRaj region STQC + CISO + 2nd-line
Community cloud · empanelled MeitY-empanelled community/sovereign cloud states with active community-cloud contracts India · listed region STQC + CISO + 2nd-line
Department on-prem NIC data centre or department-owned DC data-classification > "restricted" India · department DC STQC + NIC + CERT-In drill
Air-gapped on-prem Isolated on-prem with no external connectivity security-classified workloads India · isolated STQC + DRDO/MoD-template review where applicable

What to expect

From PoC briefing to first district live in 10–12 weeks.

The technical build clock is short. The decision clock — procurement, security review, ministry approvals — is the longer one, and we plan around it openly. Our deployments scale at the pace your CISO, your IT secretary, and your accountant general are comfortable with.

W1 W3 W7 W9 W12 · district live PHASE 1 · DISCOVERY · CONSENT ARCH PHASE 2 · STQC-ALIGNED BUILD · INTEGRATION PHASE 3 · SECURITY · UAT PHASE 4 · PHASED ROLLOUT Stakeholder alignment · data-flow map NIC backend integration · language packs · GIGW QA STQC validation · CERT-In drill CISO + IT secretary signoff UAT with the department · sandbox calls One district / one circle · then state · then mission

Government timelines are governed by procurement, security review, and political windows. The figures above are the build clock; we plan around your decision clock, and we do not treat the procurement calendar as a problem to be solved.

FAQ

The questions government buyers ask first.

Honest answers. Where the answer is "yes, with conditions," we state the conditions. Where it is "not yet, but in roadmap," we say that too.

Will Repliant deploy on MeghRaj, or on our department's on-prem infrastructure if required?

Both. Repliant deploys on MeghRaj via MeitY-empanelled CSPs, on community-cloud arrangements your state already holds, or on department-owned on-prem infrastructure — including air-gapped configurations for security-classified workloads. The choice sits with the department's IT secretary and CISO, not with us. We bring the deployment artefacts, the runbook, and the on-prem hardening guide; your team owns the environment.

How does Repliant handle Aadhaar authentication and consent under the DPDP Act 2023? Where is the consent artefact stored, and who can audit it?

Aadhaar authentication runs through your department's existing AUA/KUA arrangement — we do not become an AUA on your behalf. The consent capture, the purpose statement, and the TTL are part of the agent's policy contract and are written into a signed, immutable consent ledger. The ledger sits in your data residency; your privacy officer, your CISO, and (where applicable) the Data Protection Board's designated officer have direct query access. The citizen's right to withdraw consent and the right to access their own data are wired to the same record.

What is your STQC certification status, and which audit cycle are you currently in?

Repliant's platform is engineered against the STQC software-security and quality benchmarks, and we share the current cycle status, the auditor, and any open findings under NDA during security review. We will not state a specific cycle number on a public page; that is the kind of claim that should be verified inside your security-review process, not absorbed from a marketing page.

If a CERT-In incident occurs in a system Repliant is part of, what is your reporting workflow, and what is your contractual SLA on the six-hour window?

A named SPOC on Repliant's side notifies a named SPOC on the department's side within one hour of detection, with a structured incident report that contains everything needed to file with CERT-In well inside the six-hour window mandated under the April 2022 CERT-In Directions. Our standard SLA is contractually shorter than the regulatory window so the department has time for its own internal review. Post-incident, we participate in the joint root-cause and the regulator-facing brief; we do not disappear after the report is filed.

How do you handle code-mixed speech — a citizen who alternates Hindi and English in the same sentence, or a Tamil-English mix in Chennai?

The agent does not flinch at a mid-sentence switch — Hinglish, Tanglish, Banglish are handled as natural register, not as edge cases. Response language follows the citizen's lead: if the citizen drifts into English, the agent follows; if they shift back into Tamil, the agent shifts back. We do not force a citizen to choose one language at the start of the call and stay in it. That request is the original sin of most government IVRs.

Can Repliant operate in a strict on-prem, air-gapped deployment for security-classified workloads?

Yes — with stated trade-offs. The platform ships as a deployable artefact that runs in your isolated environment; model updates, language packs, and policy bundles are delivered on a controlled physical-media or signed-transfer cadence agreed with your security team. Latency, telemetry, and update frequency look different from a MeghRaj deployment, and the operating runbook reflects that. We do not pretend an air-gapped deployment is the same product.

What is your policy on call recordings and transcripts — retention, access, and deletion under a data principal request?

Recordings and transcripts are stored under your KMS, in your residency, with retention configured per the department's record-management policy and the DPDP Act 2023 obligations. PII is redacted before model invocation; the raw audio remains under the department's control. A data principal's right to access and right to erasure under DPDP are honoured through the same workflow your department uses for its existing data-subject requests — we do not stand up a parallel queue.

We have a long tail of legacy state systems on Oracle Forms and on a mainframe. How do you integrate without a multi-crore middleware project?

Repliant integrates against SOAP, flat-file drops, scheduled batch reconciliation, and signed gateway patterns where the modern API does not yet exist. For Oracle-Forms-class systems, we use a read-only integration pattern that does not require schema changes and that keeps the department's authoritative record exactly where it is. We have shipped against state revenue systems older than the Right to Information Act. None of this requires a middleware overhaul as a prerequisite to the first call landing.

What stops the agent from hallucinating a wrong scheme eligibility rule or a wrong tax demand amount?

The agent quotes only from your scheme guidelines, your demand register, your beneficiary database and your nodal-officer directory — never from training data. Eligibility rules are evaluated against the department's authoritative configuration; if the rule is not present, the agent says so and routes to a human officer. Tax-demand amounts are read from the issuing system; the agent does not compute liability, does not interpret a section, and does not offer a waiver. Where the agent does not have a deterministic answer, it tells the citizen so — plainly, in their language — and books a callback with the right human.

Can our empanelled SI — TCS, Wipro, Infosys, HCL, LTIMindtree or NIC — implement and maintain this, or are we locked into Repliant's services team?

Your SI can. The platform ships with documented APIs, SDKs, deployment artefacts, an SI-facing runbook and a hardening guide. Repliant's role is to support the SI's engineers during build and the department's operations team during run; we do not require a Repliant engineer permanently embedded on site for the deployment to succeed. We have done knowledge-transfer engagements with each of the major SIs and with NIC implementation teams, and we are comfortable participating in a tender as the technology partner under an SI's prime.

Repliant for Government & Public Services

If your department or mission is rethinking how it answers every call, we'd value a briefing.